Introduction to RDM

Research data undergo various processes, which can be illustrated using the research data lifecycle. This lifecycle serves as a conceptual tool to support research data management. Not all steps are always followed, nor are they always followed in the same order. Here, we would like to present a six-stage model of the data lifecycle [1]. Detailed information about each stage can be found at the respective link.

Ideally, research data management (RDM) should begin even before the application and initiation of a research project, with the planning phase (Step 1: Planning the research project). A recommended step during planning is the creation of a data management plan (DMP). Additionally, it is useful to consider file naming conventions and storage structures at this stage, to avoid chaos later on. Conducting a search for already existing research data should also be considered in this step.

Once the research project is planned and has started, data is collected as part of the work (Step 2: Collecting data). Data collection can look very different depending on the field and methodology applied. It is important not only to document the methodology but also to document the research data and any processing that may occur. Metadata play a crucial role in this context.

During the preparation and analysis of the data (Step 3: Preparing and analyzing data), documentation of all working steps should be maintained to ensure transparency and reproducibility.

Research data themselves represent a valuable resource, which can be made available and citable in the form of a data publication (Step 4: Sharing and publishing data). If careful documentation has already been maintained during data collection and preparation, this will make work much easier at this stage at the latest.

What is RDM? – Our explanatory video on the topic of Research Data Management (RDM).

What is a DMP? – Our new explanatory video focuses on the topic of “data management plans”.

Many funding agencies explicitly require the long-term archiving of research data (Step 5: Archiving data). Generally, it is not sufficient to simply publish the data as a data publication; rather, specific requirements for documentation and data security play an important role here. In many disciplines, reputable archives and data centers take on this task. Computing centers such as GWDG also offer corresponding services.

Published data can be reused in new research projects (Step 6: Reusing data). By publishing research data metadata in an appropriate repository, other researchers can discover the data. Clear usage conditions are established by assigning the appropriate license, and according to good scientific practice, the author(s) of the data publication are cited.

[1] The concept presented here is based on the data lifecycle used by the RDM information portal forschungsdaten.info.

Further information

Checklist: FAIR Researchdata

Biernacka K, Dolzycka D, Buchholz P und K Helbig (2019): Wie FAIR sind Deine Forschungsdaten?. Informationsposter. Zenodo, http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2547339

FDM-FAQ der FDMscouts.nrw

Knowledge Base of the  FDMscouts (german)

FDM-ndsHAW Zenodo Community

All publications of FDM-ndsHAW can be found in the Zenodo Community Projekt FDM-ndsHAW.

Survival Kit - First Steps in Research Data Management

Agniashvili A, Schmidt D, Mau F und P Walter (2024): Survival Kit – Erste Schritte im Forschungsdatenmanagement. Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13318391 (german)

Ten simple rules for effective research data management

Hassenstein MJ, Jung K (2025): Ten simple rules for effective research data management. PLoS Comput Biol 21(12): e1013779. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013779